Source >> International Viewpoint
A few hours ago it became known that the FSB had opened a criminal case against well-known left-wing political scientist and sociologist, editor of the Rabkor online magazine Boris Kagarlitsky. The formal reason for initiating the case was the alleged “justification of terrorism”, but we are absolutely sure that the persecution of Kagarlitsky is a political reprisal for his views.
Recently, Boris has been actively commenting on the current political situation, openly criticizing both the domestic and foreign policies of the Russian authorities.
The regime repeatedly tried to silence the political scientist – in 2018, the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements (ISMO), headed by Kagarlitsky, was recognized as a foreign agent, and in April last year, the status of a foreign agent was assigned to himself.
Having started his activity back in the Soviet Union, Kagarlitsky was first imprisoned during the rule of Yuri Andropov. Under Yeltsin, during the events of October 1993, he opposed the dissolution of the Supreme Soviet, for which he was detained and severely beaten. In 2021, for calls to participate in protests after the elections to the State Duma, he served 10 days of administrative arrest. Now Kagarlitsky can go to jail for up to 5 years.
The criminal case against Boris Kagarlitsky is an attack on the entire left movement. You can disagree as much as you like with individual statements and conclusions made by him in different periods of public activity, but we will resolve all our contradictions in the course of an open and honest discussion, when Boris is free.
We call on all socialist and communist organizations to organize a broad solidarity campaign and demand the immediate release of Boris Kagarlitsky and all political prisoners.
In his latest articles and speeches, Kagarlitsky remained invariably optimistic about the prospects for the current Russian government, or rather, their absence. Objective reality shows that this optimism is fully justified – starting a total cleansing of the remnants of civil society, the authorities are trying to plug a leak the size of a core with a bottle cap.
Art (52) Book Review (119) Books (114) Capitalism (65) China (77) Climate Emergency (97) Conservative Government (90) Conservative Party (45) COVID-19 (44) Economics (38) EcoSocialism (55) Elections (82) Europe (44) Fascism (55) Film (49) Film Review (67) France (69) Gaza (59) Imperialism (97) Israel (119) Italy (45) Keir Starmer (52) Labour Party (110) Long Read (42) Marxism (47) Palestine (159) pandemic (78) Protest (149) Russia (330) Solidarity (132) Statement (47) Trade Unionism (134) Ukraine (334) United States of America (129) War (362)
Latest Articles
- Lose‑Lose Government – PFIs and Neoliberal Pacts
Easy profits for big business at our expense – Dave Kellaway examines how Labour governments’ partnerships with business undermine services. - Peace between neofascists and war on oppressed peoples
Gilbert Achcar explores the parellels between Russia and the USA’s approach to the Ukraine war and to the Arab region. - Stop Trumps sell out: Solidarity with Ukraine ‑Russian troops out
- Rubio: “They must be eliminated; they must be eradicated.”
For all of Trump’s claims to end wars, Susan Pashkoff writes that we may see an escalation of existing wars and the creation of new tensions. - Stop Trump’s sell out : Russian troops out of Ukraine: Solidarity with Ukraine
An ACR leaflet on Ukraine
Already the backsliding begins. ITV news is reporting that the Government has changed one point in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. They have accepted that academies will retain their ‘freedom’ to set their own pay scales for teachers. So the criteria in the School Teachers Pay and Conditions document will only apply to teachers in Local Authority schools. Why have the Government climbed down on this issue? It’s not as if this is a major financial problem for academies. But what will be the next change/climb down by the Government? Will academies be exempt from the National Curriculum? Will Local Authorities be able to build schools according to the needs of their communities or will all new schools, as at present, have to be academies?