Source >> International Viewpoint
A few hours ago it became known that the FSB had opened a criminal case against well-known left-wing political scientist and sociologist, editor of the Rabkor online magazine Boris Kagarlitsky. The formal reason for initiating the case was the alleged “justification of terrorism”, but we are absolutely sure that the persecution of Kagarlitsky is a political reprisal for his views.
Recently, Boris has been actively commenting on the current political situation, openly criticizing both the domestic and foreign policies of the Russian authorities.
The regime repeatedly tried to silence the political scientist – in 2018, the Institute of Globalization and Social Movements (ISMO), headed by Kagarlitsky, was recognized as a foreign agent, and in April last year, the status of a foreign agent was assigned to himself.
Having started his activity back in the Soviet Union, Kagarlitsky was first imprisoned during the rule of Yuri Andropov. Under Yeltsin, during the events of October 1993, he opposed the dissolution of the Supreme Soviet, for which he was detained and severely beaten. In 2021, for calls to participate in protests after the elections to the State Duma, he served 10 days of administrative arrest. Now Kagarlitsky can go to jail for up to 5 years.
The criminal case against Boris Kagarlitsky is an attack on the entire left movement. You can disagree as much as you like with individual statements and conclusions made by him in different periods of public activity, but we will resolve all our contradictions in the course of an open and honest discussion, when Boris is free.
We call on all socialist and communist organizations to organize a broad solidarity campaign and demand the immediate release of Boris Kagarlitsky and all political prisoners.
In his latest articles and speeches, Kagarlitsky remained invariably optimistic about the prospects for the current Russian government, or rather, their absence. Objective reality shows that this optimism is fully justified – starting a total cleansing of the remnants of civil society, the authorities are trying to plug a leak the size of a core with a bottle cap.
Art (52) Book Review (121) Books (114) Capitalism (65) China (79) Climate Emergency (97) Conservative Government (90) Conservative Party (45) COVID-19 (44) Economics (39) EcoSocialism (55) Elections (82) Europe (44) Fascism (56) Film (49) Film Review (68) France (69) Gaza (59) Imperialism (97) Israel (119) Italy (45) Keir Starmer (52) Labour Party (110) Long Read (42) Marxism (47) Palestine (163) pandemic (78) Protest (149) Russia (334) Solidarity (133) Statement (47) Trade Unionism (134) Ukraine (339) United States of America (129) War (362)
Latest Articles
- An alternative economic plan… that could be implemented tomorrow!Labour could choose to make ‘tough choices’ on the rich to fund an expanded public service, writes Jamie Gough
- Careless PeopleIan Parker reviews a book exposing the internal workings of Facebook
- Labour’s neoliberal agenda on financial regulation Is Starmer repeating the mistakes the led to the 2007 financial crash? Labour seeks to cut regulation to encourage growth, but Ruth MacKenzie and Simon Hannah argue that this is a dangerous approach.
- ‘Even silence is viewed as dissent’: An interview with Russian trade unionist Pavel KudyukinPavel Kudyukin is co-chair of the University Solidarity trade union and a member of the Council of the Confederation of Labour of Russia (KTR). He also served as Russia’ deputy minister of labour (1991-93). In this extensive interview with Federico Fuentes and Serhii Shlyapnikov for LINKS International Journal of Socialist Renewal, Kudyukin talks about the situation of workers and trade unions in Russia and the territories it occupies, and the debate over whether to expel Russian unions from international bodies. Kudyukin also discusses the differing stances among Russian leftists towards Russia’s war on Ukraine, and the campaigns to free political prisoners held in Russian jails.
- Downright Nasty and Dangerous Reforms from the Labour PartyOn Tuesday 18 March, the government announced its well -trailed attacks on disabled people. If they hoped that the fact they dropped the suggestion of freezing PIP levels would placate disabled campaigners they were very mistaken. Gail Ward looks at the main elements of the Green Paper.