This wonderful film, just released, is based on the experiences of the director’s brother during the Bataclan attack in Paris in 2015.
Wonderfully acted, it is centred around the main character, Mia, who is a translator of Russian. It shows how she came to be in the bombed restaurant completely by chance. She had been in a different restaurant with her doctor partner, who was called away urgently. As she set off for home, she went into the bombed restaurant because it was pouring with rain.
You see her interactions with people before the shooting and explosion.
All of the attacks in 2015 had a significant impact on France. There was a feeling of a lack of safety.
This film successfully shows the effects of tragedy on different individuals, all of whom react slightly differently. They come together for weekly discussions.
Mia has totally lost all memory of the time after the attack started. She sets about trying to reconstruct what happened with the help of the others. All of them are trying to answer for themselves as to why it was they who survived and not others.
There was the daughter who was meant to be with her parents, who both died, but was with her girlfriend. The wife, who was not at her husband’s birthday party, could not now relate to him. Then you have the wife whose husband died, but she survived, and she accuses Mia of endangering them all.
I have not seen a film that has tried to show these effects. The changes made to people’s lives are usually dealt with in films on bombings, which usually deal with the wider picture or show people as heroes.
Mia slowly remembers and realises that an important part of her story is about a chef who hid with her.
This raises something important: the waiting and cooking staff have almost all been replaced, including this chef. They were nearly all Sans Papiers (undocumented migrants), often with false names. The owners had gotten rid of them. When Mia tracks any of them down, they are scared to talk.
So although the media makes huge propaganda about attacks, the individuals receive little help, apart from dealing with injuries or funerals.
I was with my son in Paris at the time of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack in 2015, in a restaurant, when everybody crowded around the TV to watch. They said not everybody was caught. We then went to get on the sleeper to Barcelona and were nervous about our fellow carriage occupant. We had not even been close to the attack.
This wonderfully acted film is well worth seeing and thinking about.
Art (54) Book Review (126) Books (114) Capitalism (68) China (81) Climate Emergency (99) Conservative Government (90) Conservative Party (45) COVID-19 (44) EcoSocialism (56) Elections (83) Europe (46) Fascism (60) Film (49) Film Review (68) France (71) Gaza (61) History (43) Imperialism (100) Israel (127) Italy (46) Keir Starmer (55) Labour Party (113) Marxism (50) Marxist Theory (48) Palestine (175) pandemic (78) Protest (152) Russia (340) Solidarity (145) Statement (49) Trade Unionism (142) Ukraine (347) United States of America (133) War (368)
Latest Articles
- Debate: The oppression of women doesn’t mean men directly benefit
The divisions between men and women in capitalist society grow more and more acute as the crisis deepens. Policies like positive action and equal opportunities are seen as divisive and against men’s interests. And some feminists argue that men’s oppression of women, while having something to do with the structure of class society nonetheless requires a separate struggle by women against men and male attitudes. Judith Arkwright disputes such accepted wisdom within the women’s movement. She argues that it is dangerous to argue that men in some way benefit from women’s oppression, and certainly incompatible with Marxist analysis. - Debate: men do benefit from women’s oppression
Yvonne Taylor and Judy Watson challenge the view that there is no contradiction between the immediate and class interests of working class men. They argue that an analysis of patriarchy can be situated within a class framework. [International, March 1982] - Felix Morrow’s Revolution and Counter Revolution in Spain [review by Ernest Mandel]
Ernest Mandel reviews Felix Morrow’s book Revolution and Counter Revolution in Spain, New Park Publications - Nepal protests have deeper roots
Under the right conditions, a spark can start a prairie fire. Protests against a social media in Nepal ban grew into a full blown uprising after police killed 19 protesters. Houses of prominent politicians were attacked, the parliament set on fire and the government is in shambles. But what is next? Alex de Jong provides answers. - Far right protest in London: A LOUD WAKE‑UP CALL FOR YOUR PARTY!
Allan Todd writes about the urgent need for mass socialist opposition to the far right