This wonderful film, just released, is based on the experiences of the director’s brother during the Bataclan attack in Paris in 2015.
Wonderfully acted, it is centred around the main character, Mia, who is a translator of Russian. It shows how she came to be in the bombed restaurant completely by chance. She had been in a different restaurant with her doctor partner, who was called away urgently. As she set off for home, she went into the bombed restaurant because it was pouring with rain.
You see her interactions with people before the shooting and explosion.
All of the attacks in 2015 had a significant impact on France. There was a feeling of a lack of safety.
This film successfully shows the effects of tragedy on different individuals, all of whom react slightly differently. They come together for weekly discussions.
Mia has totally lost all memory of the time after the attack started. She sets about trying to reconstruct what happened with the help of the others. All of them are trying to answer for themselves as to why it was they who survived and not others.
There was the daughter who was meant to be with her parents, who both died, but was with her girlfriend. The wife, who was not at her husband’s birthday party, could not now relate to him. Then you have the wife whose husband died, but she survived, and she accuses Mia of endangering them all.
I have not seen a film that has tried to show these effects. The changes made to people’s lives are usually dealt with in films on bombings, which usually deal with the wider picture or show people as heroes.
Mia slowly remembers and realises that an important part of her story is about a chef who hid with her.
This raises something important: the waiting and cooking staff have almost all been replaced, including this chef. They were nearly all Sans Papiers (undocumented migrants), often with false names. The owners had gotten rid of them. When Mia tracks any of them down, they are scared to talk.
So although the media makes huge propaganda about attacks, the individuals receive little help, apart from dealing with injuries or funerals.
I was with my son in Paris at the time of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack in 2015, in a restaurant, when everybody crowded around the TV to watch. They said not everybody was caught. We then went to get on the sleeper to Barcelona and were nervous about our fellow carriage occupant. We had not even been close to the attack.
This wonderfully acted film is well worth seeing and thinking about.
Art (52) Book Review (119) Books (114) Capitalism (65) China (77) Climate Emergency (97) Conservative Government (90) Conservative Party (45) COVID-19 (44) Economics (38) EcoSocialism (55) Elections (82) Europe (44) Fascism (55) Film (49) Film Review (67) France (69) Gaza (59) Imperialism (97) Israel (119) Italy (45) Keir Starmer (52) Labour Party (110) Long Read (42) Marxism (47) Palestine (159) pandemic (78) Protest (149) Russia (330) Solidarity (132) Statement (47) Trade Unionism (134) Ukraine (334) United States of America (129) War (362)
Latest Articles
- Lose‑Lose Government – PFIs and Neoliberal Pacts
Easy profits for big business at our expense – Dave Kellaway examines how Labour governments’ partnerships with business undermine services. - Peace between neofascists and war on oppressed peoples
Gilbert Achcar explores the parellels between Russia and the USA’s approach to the Ukraine war and to the Arab region. - Stop Trumps sell out: Solidarity with Ukraine ‑Russian troops out
- Rubio: “They must be eliminated; they must be eradicated.”
For all of Trump’s claims to end wars, Susan Pashkoff writes that we may see an escalation of existing wars and the creation of new tensions. - Stop Trump’s sell out : Russian troops out of Ukraine: Solidarity with Ukraine
An ACR leaflet on Ukraine
Already the backsliding begins. ITV news is reporting that the Government has changed one point in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. They have accepted that academies will retain their ‘freedom’ to set their own pay scales for teachers. So the criteria in the School Teachers Pay and Conditions document will only apply to teachers in Local Authority schools. Why have the Government climbed down on this issue? It’s not as if this is a major financial problem for academies. But what will be the next change/climb down by the Government? Will academies be exempt from the National Curriculum? Will Local Authorities be able to build schools according to the needs of their communities or will all new schools, as at present, have to be academies?