The Fate of Abraham: Why the West is Wrong about Islam by Peter Oborne (Simon & Schuster)
Why review this book? At first glance, a book by a longtime journalist for The Telegraph who is against Marxism might not seem very interesting. But Oborne explains how he had a moment of change when reporting the beginning of the Iraq war. He saw the lies by the establishment about weapons of mass destruction and how the media hyped them up. This led him to make a 20-year study of Islam and how the West sees it. More importantly, he was interested in how Islamophobia could take such a hold.
The book examines three countries’ reactions to Muslims. For him, the most important country is the USA because it leads the pack. This section is really useful in that it deals with a period when the US had no navy. Its civilian trading ships were attacked by “Barbary Pirates,” and many sailors were enslaved. When they got back to the US, slaves who had escaped or been freed said they had been tortured and locked up.
In the US at the time, this had a big impact, i.e., that white men could be enslaved. The campaign against black slavery was underway. The sensationalised stories created hostility toward Islam, especially as the only book that almost all early American colonists had read was the Bible.
He then deals with Christian Zionism, its history, and its influence in the US, from presidents on down. The development of an Islamic component in the population and how some were involved in the Black Power movement are dealt with. The author finally looks at the effects of 9/11, the war on terror, and new notions of homeland security. Finally, there is Trump, who promoted Islamophobia while remaining friendly with Saudi Arabia.
Britain and Islam
The next section outlines the history of Britain and Islam. From Bede, the battles with the Ottomans, and the rise of Muslim communities in the population. Trade with the east, led by the East India Company, was all about the appetite and profitability of valuable spices and other Eastern goods. The import of coffee led to the establishment of coffee houses.
On the back of the trade, there was the imposition of Muslim colonies and the British Raj’s use of “divide and rule” in India. The “Indian Revolt” of the 1850s, which was mainly Muslim, created a great shock, including “the black hole of Calcutta” imagery that was established in the media of the time. Of course, it ignored the butchery by the British forces of the East India Company.
This section of the history of the early 20th century in Britain and its empire, and the two World Wars, is useful in seeing the racist attitudes of the Conservatives, Labour, and the unions toward Muslim seamen. On Churchill, he seems very generous, considering his monstrous record.
Algeria
The third section is dedicated to France. This I found the most useful, in that Oborne deals with the importance of Algeria, which it established as a colony and settled huge numbers of colonists. At one point, the capital, Algiers, had 87% colonists. The colonists (Colons) took all the best land and were backed by the French army. Tunisia and Morocco were protectorates, and though financially and politically completely controlled by France, they were not of the same importance.
So, the battle for Algerian independence was incredibly violent, and hundreds of thousands died. When finally successful, it is estimated that 3.5 million colons “returned” to France (many of them having never come from there, being Italian, Maltese, and so on). These people were the basis of the French fascist movements after 1962. This is why it has been so strong even up until today. Hostility toward the people of the Maghreb (Arabic North Africa) is led by the families of the Colons.
The remainder of the book focuses on the United States and the United Kingdom, as well as the ideological underpinnings of the war on Islam. This starts with the ex-Islamic militants who made a career of attacking Islamic ideology, particularly the two main ones who formed the Quilliam foundation, which was utilised by Blair. The aim was to split good Muslims (supporters of the British state) from bad Muslims. He described how these people were able to create a lucrative career out of their campaigns, at one point pulling in the far right leader, Tommy Robinson.
Trojan Horse
The main point Oborne makes is about how “Policy Exchange,” a neoconservative think tank based in the UK and funded by the US, was able to figure out how the British political establishment felt about Muslims. They attacked not just extremists but the ideas that would become gateways to extremists. This body was first chaired by Michael Gove. An interesting piece here is how Baroness Warsi, joint chair of the Tory Party, was removed by Gove. This is the period of the “cold war” on Islam as the enemy within, the sharpening up of “Prevent,” and the invention of non-violent extremism. Enter the media: Quilliam and others have been saying that Islam is taking over, introducing Sharia law, and infiltrating schools. Along came the “Trojan Horse Affair.”
Oborne deals with this brilliantly. As a journalist, he is able to interview all sorts of people, and he shows that this arose out of an interview with a Muslim man who was fed up with his sons’ school in Birmingham, which was one of the worst performing in the country with only a 5% pass rate for five GCSEs. He was a governor, and he became the chair. He completely transformed the school, which now has a 75% pass rate, one of the best in the country. It was praised by all official bodies, and he was invited to speak all over Britain. Then came a forged anonymous letter, saying that he was carrying out an Islamic takeover. The result of the media campaign was that he ended up being banned from ever becoming a governor again.
The quality of the school has dropped. An official enquiry found that there was nothing in the stories, basically clearing him, but this result got no real coverage, and most people still believed the original stories.
Islamophobia
A similar process has been observed with the grooming gangs. Oborne demolishes the so-called research quoted by politicians, which gives a distorted view of who commits child abuse. He does not excuse the people involved or the sentences. However, he does point out that the media concentrates on Muslims, so the fact that most abuse is inflicted by people known to the victim is ignored.
Similarly, figures on American terrorism show that the majority of actions is carried out by white extremists, while the media would suggest that Muslims are to blame.
One aspect that is often missed when examining the issue of Islamophobia is its effects on so many people’s lives. He interviews the relatives of a man in Guantanamo Bay, whose life has been ruined, as one example, but there are many more.
Oborne uses his access to top politicians to give us quotes and sources that are otherwise unavailable. He also shows he has researched his subject well. His aim is to expose the lie that the threat in the UK and the US is from Islam.
Obviously, I do not necessarily agree with all he says, particularly that Marxism excuses all violence, but well done to him for helping the struggle against racism. It is a big book, and I have only touched on themes, but you could benefit from even just reading sections.
Art Book Review Books Capitalism China Climate Emergency Conservative Government Conservative Party COVID-19 Creeping Fascism Economics EcoSocialism Elections Europe Event Video Far-Right Fascism Film Film Review France Gaza History Imperialism Israel Italy Keir Starmer Labour Party London Long Read Marxism Marxist Theory Migrants Palestine pandemic Police Protest Russia Solidarity Statement Trade Unionism Trans*Mission Transphobia Ukraine United States of America War
Peter Oborne has repeatedly stated that the Birmingham “Trojan Horse” affair was a “fake media narrative” (to quote from his column in the October 2022 ‘Byline Times’). He’s wrong.
I’ll start by making it clear that it was accepted by almost everyone, from the outset, that the Trojan Horse letter was a “fake” in the sense that it was not what it purported to be (advice from a Birmingham Muslim fundamentalist to a co-thinker in Bradford on how to take over schools), but a ruse to draw attention to what the creator of the letter believed was going on in certain Birmingham schools. That does not mean that claims of an Islamist campaign (or “plot” – call it what you will) were false.
Some of the truth finally came out when one of the school leaders accused of misconduct and dismissed, Fazwan Faraz, brought a claim to an Employment Tribunal in 2018. As ET cases and decisions are in the public domain, we can examine this one in some detail.
Faraz was one of five people accused of misconduct who had the cases against them dropped by the NCTL (National College for Teaching and Leadership) disciplinary panel in 2017.
Supporters of the five (accused of organising to impose a “narrow faith based ideology” upon Birmingham state schools), including Islamist organisations, the Guardian (in particular, its education editor Richard Adams), the SWP and the (then) Tory journalist Oborne, hailed the collapse of the cases as a vindication of their stance that the Trojan Horse affair was a witch-hunt based upon a “forged” document and fuelled by Islamophobia.
In fact, the collapse of the cases proved nothing of the sort: it was necessitated by legal technicality (an important technicality, but a technicality nonetheless) resulting from the incompetence of the NCTL’s lawyers who had failed to disclose evidence used as part of its prosecution.
What the collapse didn’t show (despite the claims of the likes of the SWP, Oborne and Adams) was that the evidence against the five was untrue. But that’s what entered the “common sense” view of many decent, anti-racist people on the left and the liberal-left.
So Razwan Faraz would have been well advised, once the NCTL case against him had collapsed, to have left it at that. I strongly suspect (but do not know for sure) that his very capable legal adviser during the NCTL hearing, the barrister Andrew Faux, would have advised him to do exactly that. But no, Mr Faraz insisted upon bringing a claim of religious discrimination and unfair dismissal against Birmingham Core Education Trust (who’d dismissed him from his job as Deputy Head of Nansen Primary School in 2015) at an Employment Tribunal.
The Tribunal published its decision and its reasoning: It found that Mr Faraz was fairly dismissed because of comments he made on a Whatsapp group called ‘Park Hill Brotherhood’ in which he described gay people as “animals”.
He’d written: “These animals are going out in full force. As teachers we must be aware and counter their satanic ways of influencing young people.”
The Employment Judge, Richard Henderson, said his (Faraz’s) comments were “demonstrably homophobic” and described Fraz as “evasive” and “not a credible witness”.
This alone is more than sufficient to show that Oborne’s dismissal of “Trojan Horse” as simply a “fake media narrative” is – quite simply – wrong.