* In the age of social media celebrities, brands have made their priority clear: it’s not about making a statement or supporting a cause, but about making money.
As the world of influencers continues to evolve, a disturbing pattern has emerged: brands are prioritising profits over purpose, undermining the very authenticity that once made these partnerships so appealing.
In the early days of influencer marketing, brands were more interested in partnering with influencers who shared their values and who could help them connect with their target audience on a deeper level. However, as influencer marketing has become more mainstream, brands have become more focused on the bottom line. They are now more likely to partner with influencers who have a large following, regardless of whether or not they share the brand’s values.
This shift towards profit-driven partnerships has led to a decline in the authenticity of influencer marketing. Influencers are now under pressure to promote products and services that they don’t actually believe in, and this can lead to inauthentic and misleading endorsements.
In addition, the focus on profits has led to a decline in the quality of influencer content. Influencers are now more likely to produce content that is designed to drive sales, rather than content that is informative or entertaining. This can lead to a less engaging experience for consumers.
The Rise of Influencer Culture
How social media stars changed the game for marketing
In the early days of social media, influencers were largely seen as a novelty. But as these platforms grew in popularity, so too did the power of influencers. Today, some of the biggest social media stars have millions of followers, and their endorsements can carry a lot of weight.
This has made influencers a prime target for brands seeking to capitalise on their reach. In fact, the influencer marketing industry is now worth billions of pounds. And as the industry has grown, so too has the pressure on influencers to deliver results.
Influencers are now expected to create high-quality content, engage with their followers, and drive sales for brands. This can be a lot of work, and it’s not always easy to maintain authenticity when you’re constantly being paid to promote products and services.
As a result, there has been a growing backlash against influencer marketing. Some people argue that influencers are simply selling out their personal brands to the highest bidder. Others worry that the constant stream of sponsored content is making it harder for people to know who to trust.
Whatever your opinion on influencer marketing, there’s no doubt that it’s a powerful force in the world of marketing. And as the industry continues to grow, it will be interesting to see how it evolves in the years to come.
Here are some examples of how social media stars have changed the game for marketing:
- Kylie Jenner is one of the most successful influencers in the world. She has over 330 million followers on Instagram, and her endorsement deals are worth millions of dollars. In 2019, she made $1 million for a single sponsored post on Instagram.
- Kim Kardashian is another hugely successful influencer. She has over 310 million followers on Instagram, and her endorsement deals are also worth millions of dollars. In 2018, she made $64 million from endorsements.
- Beyoncé is a global superstar, and she uses her social media platforms to promote her music and other projects. She has over 220 million followers on Instagram, and her posts often get millions of likes and comments.
- Cristiano Ronaldo is one of the most famous athletes in the world, and he uses his social media platforms to promote his personal brand and his various sponsorship deals. He has over 560 million followers on Instagram, and his posts often get millions of likes and comments.
These are just a few examples of how social media stars have changed the game for marketing. Influencers now have the power to reach millions of people with a single post, and brands are willing to pay big money to tap into that power.
The Dark Side of Influencer Marketing
The commodification of personal identity
Here, we’ll delve into the ways that influencer marketing has led to the commodification of personal identity, with influencers themselves becoming mere vessels for brand messaging. As the line between personal beliefs and corporate interests blur, the authenticity that once drew audiences to these individuals is now at risk.
One of the most common criticisms of influencer marketing is that it leads to the commodification of personal identity. This means that influencers are essentially selling their personal brands to brands, who then use them to promote their products and services. This can be seen as problematic, as it can lead to influencers becoming less authentic and more like walking billboards.
For example, let’s say that an influencer is known for their love of fashion. They might be approached by a brand of clothing to promote their products. If the influencer agrees to the deal, they will likely be required to post about the brand’s products on their social media accounts. This could mean taking pictures of themselves wearing the clothes, or talking about how much they love the brand.
While this might seem harmless, it can actually have a negative impact on the influencer’s credibility. If their followers know that they are being paid to promote a product, they may be less likely to trust their recommendations. In addition, the influencer may start to feel like they are losing control of their own personal brand. They may feel like they are constantly being told what to say and do by brands, and they may start to resent it.
Another criticism of influencer marketing is that it can lead to fakeness. This is because influencers are often under pressure to create content that is perfect and polished. They may feel like they need to put on a show for their followers, and they may not always be able to be themselves. This can lead to a lot of inauthenticity, as influencers start to create personas that are not true to who they really are.
For example, let’s say that an influencer is known for their perfect skin. They might be constantly posting pictures of their flawless complexion, and they might even use filters and editing to make their skin look even better. This can create a false sense of reality for their followers, who may start to feel like they can never measure up. In addition, the influencer may start to feel like they can never be good enough, as they are constantly trying to live up to the perfect image that they have created.
Overall, the commodification of personal identity is a major concern in the world of influencer marketing. It is important for influencers to be aware of this issue, and to make sure that they are not losing sight of who they are in the process of promoting brands.
The Profit-Driven Pursuit
When money trumps morality
In this section, we’ll examine how the drive for profits has led brands to prioritise lucrative partnerships over supporting meaningful causes. We’ll also discuss how influencers are often complicit in these endeavors, as they accept lucrative deals without considering the consequences of their actions.
One of the most common criticisms of influencer marketing is that it is often driven by profit, rather than by a desire to do good. This is because influencers are typically paid to promote products and services, and they may not always be honest about their opinions of those products. This can lead to consumers being misled, and it can also damage the reputation of the influencer.
However, it is important to remember that capitalism is a system based on the pursuit of profit. In a capitalist system, businesses are driven to make as much money as possible, and they will often use whatever means necessary to do so. This includes using influencer marketing to promote their products and services.
While it is true that influencer marketing can be used to mislead consumers, it is also true that it can be used to promote products and services that are actually beneficial to people. For example, an influencer might promote a healthy diet or a sustainable lifestyle. In these cases, influencer marketing can be used to educate and empower consumers.
Ultimately, whether or not influencer marketing is a good thing depends on the individual influencer and the products or services that they are promoting. It is important to be aware of the potential risks of influencer marketing, but it is also important to remember that it can be used for good.
For example, let’s say that a brand is looking to promote its new line of sustainable clothing. They might reach out to an influencer who is known for their love of fashion and their commitment to sustainability. However, the influencer might also have a large following of young people who are interested in fast fashion. In this case, the brand might be more likely to partner with the influencer, even though they know that their followers are not actually interested in sustainable fashion.
This can be seen as problematic, as it can lead to brands promoting products and services that are not actually aligned with their values. In addition, it can also lead to influencers becoming less authentic, as they are constantly being told what to say and do by brands.
Another criticism of influencer marketing is that it can be used to promote products and services that are harmful to people or the environment. For example, let’s say that an influencer is sponsored by a brand of fast food. The influencer might post pictures of themselves eating the fast food, and they might even talk about how much they love it. However, fast food is often high in calories, fat, and sugar. It can also be harmful to the environment, as it is often produced using unsustainable practices.
In this case, the influencer is essentially promoting a product that is harmful to people and the environment. This can be seen as unethical, as it can lead people to make choices that are not in their best interests.
Overall, the profit-driven pursuit of influencer marketing is a major concern. It is important for brands and influencers to be aware of this issue, and to make sure that they are not promoting products and services that are harmful to people or the environment.
Lost in the Noise
The diminishing impact of genuine advocacy
As we delve into the ways that the relentless pursuit of profit has eroded the power of influencer advocacy, we’ll consider the implications of this shift. With brands and influencers focused on their bottom line, the potential for genuine social change is diminished, leaving those in need of support more vulnerable than ever.
One of the most common criticisms of influencer marketing is that it is often used to promote products and services that are not actually aligned with the influencer’s values. This can be seen as problematic, as it can lead to influencers becoming less authentic, as they are constantly being told what to say and do by brands.
In addition, it can also lead to a decrease in the impact of genuine advocacy. This is because when influencers are seen as being more interested in making money than in making a difference, their message is less likely to be taken seriously.
For example, let’s say that an influencer is known for their commitment to environmental sustainability. They might post pictures of themselves recycling and composting, and they might even talk about how important it is to reduce our impact on the environment. However, if the influencer is then seen promoting a product that is harmful to the environment, their message is likely to be lost.
In this case, the influencer is essentially saying that they are only interested in sustainability when it is convenient for them. This can be seen as hypocritical, and it can lead people to question the authenticity of the influencer’s message.
Overall, the erosion of the power of influencer advocacy is a major concern. It is important for brands and influencers to be aware of this issue, and to make sure that they are not promoting products and services that are harmful to people or the environment.
It is also important for influencers to be genuine in their advocacy. If they are only interested in making money, their message is likely to be lost. However, if they are truly passionate about making a difference, they can use their platform to raise awareness of important issues and to encourage their followers to take action.
Navigating the Backlash: Bud Light and Nike
The cost of progressive values in a polarised world
In this section, we’ll examine the recent backlash faced by brands like Bud Light and Nike after partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. As reactionaries call for boycotts and threaten violence, we’ll explore the challenges brands face when attempting to promote progressive values in an increasingly polarised society.
Bud Light’s “365 Days of Girlhood” campaign and Nike’s women’s workout gear line featuring Mulvaney ignited a firestorm of criticism from conservative circles. Accusations of promoting “gender ideology,” “grooming,” and “pushing a woke agenda” flooded social media, highlighting the risks that come with taking a stand on contentious issues.
While Nike released a statement reaffirming its commitment to inclusivity and expressing pride in partnering with Mulvaney, Bud Light has yet to respond. This backlash is part of a broader trend in which conservatives target brands like Starbucks, Gillette, and Nike for supporting causes such as Black Lives Matter and LGBTQ+ rights.
As traditionalists opposition to progressive values grows louder, brands must carefully navigate the line between promoting inclusivity and alienating potential customers.
It is a difficult balancing act, but it is one that brands must master if they want to be successful in today’s world.
Despite the risks, there are also positive messages to be taken from the backlash faced by Bud Light and Nike. The fact that these brands were willing to stand up for what they believe in, even in the face of criticism, is a sign of progress. It shows that there is a growing movement of people who are committed to inclusivity and equality.
Brands experiencing backlash for using trans or progressive influencers must remain steadfast in their commitment to diversity and inclusion, as the future of business belongs to those who uphold their values, even when facing opposition.
It is also important to remember that the backlash against these brands is not representative of the views of all society. There are many, even conservatives who support LGBTQ+ rights and who believe in inclusivity. The backlash is simply a vocal minority.
In the end, the backlash faced by Bud Light and Nike is a reminder that progress is never easy. There will always be those who oppose change. But if we are to create a more just world, we must continue to stand up for what we believe in, even when it is difficult.
Extreme Attacks on Trans Influencers
The right wing hype of the traditional woman and its promotion of conservative values have led to an increase in extreme attacks on the trans community and trans influencers. These attacks stem from the desire to maintain traditional gender roles and resist progressive values, demonstrating the challenges faced by both influencers and brands in navigating this polarised landscape.
The Right-Wing Hype of the Traditional Woman
Debunking outdated stereotypes and advocating for individual choices
In this section, we explore the recent phenomenon of the right wing hype of the traditional woman, its roots in social media and political shifts, and the lack of scientific evidence supporting its claims. We also emphasise the importance of recognising individuality and the freedom for women to choose their own paths without judgment or pressure.
The Rise of the Traditional Woman Hype
The promotion of the traditional woman by right wing voices has gained momentum due to the increased reach of social media and the emboldening effect of Donald Trump’s precedency. This trend pushes the narrative of the Christian fundamentalist right that traditional women, particularly those who stay at home, are crucial for stable and successful families.
Debunking Unsupported Claims
Despite the right wing arguments, there is no scientific evidence to support the notion that a woman’s employment status correlates with her child’s well-being, nor that traditional women are inherently more faithful or supportive wives. These claims are based on outdated and sexist stereotypes, perpetuating harmful misconceptions about women’s roles in society.
The Risks of Celebrity Endorsements
Brands must tread carefully when associating with controversial figures
Matt Symonds, writing in Forbes last year examined the potential risks associated with celebrity endorsements. When a celebrity’s image becomes tarnished, the consequences can spill over to the brands they represent, making it crucial for companies to exercise caution when selecting their endorsers.
As Symonds notes, celebrity endorsement deals are often predicated on the idea that the celebrity’s image will positively influence the endorsed product. However, when a celebrity’s image becomes marred by controversy, the results can be detrimental to the brands they are associated with. Ye’s (previously known as Kanye West) recent string of controversies serves as an example of how a celebrity’s image can be damaged, and the potential fallout for brands that align themselves with such figures.
In 2022, Ye made a number of controversial statements (continuing into 2023) and actions, including supporting Donald Trump and making outbursts on social media. These controversies have damaged Ye’s image, and they have also had a negative impact on the brands he has endorsed. For example, Ye’s endorsement deal with Adidas was reportedly worth $10 million, but the company has since suspended the deal due to Ye’s behaviour.
The risks of celebrity endorsements are not limited to cases of controversy. Even when a celebrity has a positive image, there is always the possibility that their image could be damaged in the future. This is why it is important for brands to carefully consider the potential risks before partnering with a celebrity.
There are a number of factors that brands should consider when evaluating the risks of celebrity endorsements. One factor is the celebrity’s image. Brands should make sure that the celebrity’s image is a good fit for the brand’s own image. They should also consider the celebrity’s past behavior and whether there is any risk that they could engage in future behavior that could damage the brand’s image.
Another factor that brands should consider is the celebrity’s social media presence. Celebrities with a large social media following can be very effective endorsers, but they can also be very risky. If a celebrity says or does something controversial on social media, it can have a negative impact on the brands they endorse.
Finally, brands should consider the celebrity’s contract. The contract should include provisions that protect the brand in the event that the celebrity’s image is damaged. For example, the contract should allow the brand to terminate the deal if the celebrity’s image is damaged.
By carefully considering the risks of celebrity endorsements, brands can avoid the negative consequences that may arise from ill-considered endorsement deals.
The Dark Side of Influencer-Driven Cryptocurrency Hype
The devastating consequences of influencer-backed scams
Two cases of influencer-driven cryptocurrency scams, BitConnect and Centra Tech, caused significant financial losses for investors. As influencers promoted these fraudulent schemes, the incidents underscore the importance of due diligence and critical thinking in the world of influencer marketing.
BitConnect: The Ponzi Scheme Disguised as a Cryptocurrency
Influencers, including social media celebrities and professional athletes, promoted BitConnect as a revolutionary investment opportunity, urging their followers to invest in the cryptocurrency. However, BitConnect was a Ponzi scheme that used new investors’ money to pay off existing investors, ultimately collapsing and causing billions of dollars in losses.
Centra Tech: The Lavish Scam Backed by High-Profile Influencers
Centra Tech, a cryptocurrency company claiming to develop a new payment processing system for cryptocurrencies, was promoted by influencers such as Floyd Mayweather and DJ Khaled. However, Centra Tech was a scam with no working products, using investor money to fund its extravagant lifestyle. When the scheme unraveled, investors lost millions of dollars.
Influencers on the Hook: Legal Implications of Promoting Shady Investments
The BitConnect case and the responsibilities of influencers
In this section, we will discuss the legal implications for influencers who promote fraudulent investments, as demonstrated by the BitConnect case. The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that influencers could be held liable for soliciting investments using social media, a decision that may have far-reaching consequences for those promoting cryptocurrencies, ICOs, and other investments.
The BitConnect Case and the Court’s Ruling
Investors in the BitConnect Ponzi scheme filed a class-action lawsuit against the company and its promoters, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933. The district court initially dismissed the case, but the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, finding that promoters’ online videos and social media posts constituted solicitations and that they “knew or should have known that their statements were false and misleading.”
Legal Warning for Influencers
The appeals court’s ruling serves as a warning to influencers promoting dubious crypto investments, as they could be held liable for violating the Securities Act if they make false or misleading statements about investments. This ruling may also impact other influencers promoting cryptocurrencies, ICOs, and other investments.
Navigating the Risks and Responsibilities
Influencers promoting investments must be aware of the risks involved and their legal responsibilities. To protect themselves and their followers, influencers should ensure they have a thorough understanding of the investments they promote and avoid making false or misleading statements. By staying informed and exercising caution, influencers can mitigate the potential for liability under the Securities Act.
The Marxist Lens: Exploitation and Alienation in Influencer Marketing
Unraveling the darker aspects of the influencer economy
In this section, we will examine influencer marketing from a Marxist perspective, highlighting the potential exploitation and alienation influencers may experience as they sell their labour power to brands for profit generation. We will also discuss the importance of being aware of these issues to make informed decisions about participating in influencer marketing.
The Exploitative Nature of Influencer Marketing
Influencers often receive commissions rather than salaries, which can lead to a range of issues, such as constant pressure to generate sales, lack of a steady income, and unfair wages. As they struggle to create authentic content while maximising profits, influencers may find themselves feeling stressed, overworked, and undervalued.
Alienation in the Influencer Economy
Influencers can also experience alienation as they lose control over their work and the products they promote. With limited creative control and pressure to generate sales, influencers may feel disconnected from their own labour and the products they advertise.
Reification and Objectification of Influencers
Reification occurs when influencers are treated as commodities, valued only for their appearance and ability to attract followers, rather than their creativity or intellect. This objectification and dehumanisation can further contribute to feelings of being used by brands.
The Potential for Ethical Influencer Marketing
While not all influencer marketing is exploitative or alienating, it is crucial to recognise the potential problems within the industry. By being aware of these issues, influencers, brands, and consumers can make informed decisions about their involvement in influencer marketing and work towards a more equitable and authentic landscape.
Reclaiming Authenticity
How we can reshape influencer culture for the greater good
In the concluding section, we’ll explore potential solutions to this growing problem. By urging brands and influencers to prioritise purpose over profits and to invest in more meaningful partnerships, we can help restore authenticity to influencer culture and foster a more socially conscious marketing landscape.
One way to do this is to encourage brands to partner with influencers who are genuinely passionate about their products and services. This will help to ensure that the partnerships are authentic and that the influencers are actually promoting products that they believe in.
Another way to restore authenticity is to encourage influencers to be transparent about their relationships with brands. This means disclosing when they are being paid to promote a product or service. This will help to build trust between influencers and their followers and will make it clear when an endorsement is not genuine.
Finally, we need to change the way we think about influencer marketing. We need to stop seeing it as a way to make money and start seeing it as a way to connect with people and make a difference. When we do this, we can help to reshape influencer culture for the greater good.
The profit motive is a major driver of the problems in influencer culture. When brands are only interested in making money, they are more likely to pressure influencers to promote products that they don’t believe in. This can lead to inauthentic and misleading endorsements.
In order to reshape influencer culture for the greater good, we need to change the way we think about the profit motive. We need to start seeing it as a means to an end, rather than an end in itself. We need to focus on using profits to create positive change in the world.
When brands and influencers prioritise purpose over profits, they can create partnerships that are authentic and meaningful. These partnerships can help to promote products and services that are actually beneficial to people and the planet. They can also help to raise awareness of important issues and to encourage people to take action.
By changing the way we think about the profit motive, we can help to reshape influencer culture for the greater good. We can create a world where influencers use their platforms to make a positive impact on the world.
Art Book Review Books Capitalism China Climate Emergency Conservative Government Conservative Party COVID-19 Economics EcoSocialism Elections Europe Fascism Film Film Review France Gaza Imperialism Israel Italy Keir Starmer Labour Party Long Read Marxism Palestine pandemic Protest Russia Solidarity Statement Trade Unionism Ukraine United States of America War
Latest Articles
- Why do some Leftists support the brutality of the Syrian regime?
The Assad regime remains a litmus test for the global Left, with the Syrian right to liberation suppressed in favour of false stability, says Sari Hanafi - Ecosocialists call for real solutions to the climate crisis
Ecosocialism conference launched strategy to build a mass movement to meet the climate emergency created by capitalism, say ecosocialist conference organising group - The Israeli right is now openly saying it wants to keep Hamas in power
As the latest round of fighting in Gaza and southern Israel died down, Meron Rapoport argues that it became clear that keeping Hamas in power has become a central tenet of the Israeli right. - Nicaragua’s blanket of repression
The Ortega-Murillo regime has betrayed the legacy of the Sandinista Revolution and makes a US-led neoliberal takeover more feasible, argues Mike Phipps. A Labour Hub long read. - Labour’s Inheritance Tax and the Fight for the Future of UK Farming
As the Labour government’s proposed inheritance tax reforms ignite protests across the UK, farmers warn that these policies threaten the survival of small and medium-sized farms. Simon Pearson spoke to Alex Heffron, a farmer, PhD student researching agricultural transitions, and advocate for agroecology, to understand the challenges facing rural communities and their broader implications for progressive politics.