Source > New Politics
The result of the first round of the Brazilian elections on October 2nd is mixed. Certainly, Lula, the candidate of the Workers’ Party, is in the lead, with 48.4% of the vote. But the hope of a victory in the first round has vanished and, above all, he is closely followed by Jair Bolsonaro, the neo-fascist candidate, with 43.2%—much more than the polls predicted. There will therefore be a second round on October 30, which, barring an unexpected reversal, should be won by Lula. However, Bolsonaro’s supporters appear to be in control of parliament as well as several regional governments. In short, the neo-fascist current will probably lose the presidency but remain an extremely powerful political force.
Brazil’s dominant classes have never had a great fondness for democracy. Inheritors of three centuries of European colonization and four centuries of slavery, they have shown, in the last hundred years, a strong propensity for states of martial law from 1930 to 1945 under the personal power of the caudillo Getulio Vargas; 1964-1985, a military dictatorship; in 2016, a pseudo-parliamentary coup against President-elect Dilma Rousseff; from 2018-2022: neo-fascist government of Jair Bolsonaro. The more or less democratic periods seem to be parenthesis between two authoritarian regimes.
The four years of Bolsonaro’s presidency have been a huge disaster for the Brazilian people. Elected with the support of the bourgeois press, business circles, landowners, banks, and neo-Pentecostal churches, he took advantage of the fact that Lula, the only opponent capable of beating him, had been put in prison under false accusations. The former captain was unable to fulfil his dream of re-establishing a military dictatorship and shooting “thirty thousand communists.” But he has sabotaged every health policy in the face of COVID, resulting in more than 600 thousand deaths; he has ravaged Brazil’s fragile public services (health, education, etc.); he has reduced tens of millions of Brazilian women to poverty; he has actively supported the destruction of the Amazon by the kings of soybeans and cattle; he has promoted neo-fascist, homophobic, misogynist, and climate-sceptic ideas; he has supported the paramilitary militias (responsible for the assassination of Marielle Franco); he has not ceased to try to set up a martial law regime.
Will the October 2022 elections put an end to this nightmare? Lula is likely to win in the second round on October 30. But Bolsonaro, following the example of his political model, Donald Trump, has already announced that he will not recognise an unfavourable result: “If I lose, it is because the vote has been falsified.” Part of the Army, strongly represented in his government, seems to support him; will it go so far as to take the initiative of a military coup against the elected president, i.e., Lula? This hypothesis cannot be ruled out, even if it does not seem the most likely: the Brazilian Army is not used to moving without the green light from the Pentagon and the State Department. But right now, Biden has no interest in supporting a tropical Trump at the helm of Brazil. Bolsonaro tried to mobilise his supporters—police, militiamen, retired generals, neo-Pentecostal pastors, etc.—to create a crisis situation comparable to that caused by Trump around the Capitol after his electoral defeat. Will he have the same success as his North American idol?
Despite the highly questionable choice of a reactionary bourgeois politician (Geraldo Alckmin) as his running mate for vice-president, it is clear that Lula—Luis Inacio da Silva, former metalworker, trade union leader of the great strikes of 1979, and founder of the Workers’ Party—is currently embodying the hope of the Brazilian people to put an end to the neo-fascist episode of the last four years. He is supported by a broad coalition of forces, which includes not only most of the organisations of the left and the social movement—trade unions, the landless movement, the homeless movement—but also the broad sectors of the industrial bourgeoisie, which, unlike the land owners, who remain loyal to Bolsonaro, came to the conclusion that the ex-captain was not a good option for business. It must be acknowledged that the electoral battle was not preceded by a rise in popular mobilisation as in Colombia.
The Party of Socialism and Freedom (PSOL), the main force of the radical and/or anti-capitalist left in Brazil—where there are several currents associated, in one form or another, with the Fourth International—decided, after a long internal debate, to support Lula from the first round. A small dissident current, led by the economist Plinio de Aruda Sampaio Jr, who disagreed with this choice, left the party, but the main left currents of the PSOL—such as the Movement of the Socialist Left (MES), whose spokeswoman, Luciana Genro, was the presidential candidate of the PSOL in 2014—have, despite their desire for a PSOL’s own candidacy in the first round, accepted the majority decision and actively participated in the campaign in support of Lula.
Most PSOL activists have no illusions about what the government led by Lula and the Workers Party (PT) would be: probably an even more unbalanced version of the social-liberal policies of class conciliation of previous experiences under the aegis of the PT. Admittedly, these experiments have allowed some social advances, but it is not certain that this will be the case this time. This will depend, of course, on the ability of the radical left and, above all, of the social movements, of the exploited and the oppressed to move, autonomously and independently. Nevertheless, it is obvious that the vote for Lula is an unavoidable necessity to free the Brazilian people from the sinister nightmare that the regime of Jair Bolsonaro has signified.
Once elected, Lula will face many difficulties: fierce opposition from sectors of the army, the kings of cattle and soybeans, neo-Pentecostal churches, and fanatical (often armed) supporters of Bolsonaro. He risks having before him a hostile Congress, dominated by reactionary forces; the present Chamber is governed by the so-called “4 Bs: beef, banks, Bibles, and bullets,” i.e., landowners, finance capital, evangelical sects, and paramilitary militias. One of the decisive battles of the future will be the rescue of the Amazon, which is being destroyed by agro-capitalism.
In addition, Lula will be, like Dilma Rousseff, under the permanent threat of a “parliamentary coup.” This results from a disastrous choice for the vice-presidency: Geraldo Alckmin, former governor of Sâo Paulo, the former right-wing opponent beaten by Dilma Rousseff in 2014. Lula probably chose him to give pledges to the bourgeoisie and disarm the right-wing opposition. But he has thus given a decisive weapon to the ruling classes. If Lula takes any action that does not please the Brazilian oligarchs, who control the majority of the parliament, he will be the subject of impeachment proceedings, as was the case with Dilma in 2016. In this sad precedent, she was punished under ridiculous pretexts, and replaced by the vice-president, Temer, a reactionary of the so-called bourgeois “centre”. The same could happen to Lula: impeachment and substitution by Alckmin. The Colombian Gustavo Petro was more skilful, choosing as running mate Francia Marquez, an Afro-Colombian woman, feminist and environmentalist.
That said, the imperative of the moment, in October 2022, is, without a doubt, the vote for Lula. As Trotsky explained so well almost a century ago, the broadest unity of all the forces of the workers’ movement is the necessary condition for defeating fascism.
The Anti*Capitalist Resistance Editorial Board may not always agree with all of the content we repost but feel it is important to give left voices a platform and develop a space for comradely debate and disagreement.
Anti-War Art Book Review Books Boris Johnson Capitalism China Climate Emergency Conservative Government Conservative Party COP 26 COVID-19 Creeping Fascism Economics EcoSocialism Elections England Event Video Fascism Film Film Review France Global Police State History Imperialism Italy Keir Starmer Labour Party Leaflet Long Read Marxism Marxist Theory NATO Palestine pandemic Protest Russia Solidarity Sport Statement Trade Unionism Transgender Ukraine United States of America War
Thanks for the interesting, important and urgent article.
I would like to add that in addition to Bolsonaro promoting vile, sexism and mysogyny towards women,homophobia towards LGBT community,he promotes racism towards Indigenous Brazilians and Afro-Brazilians while giving strength and encouragement to Brazil’s numerous fascist and nazi groups very much in the way Trump did/does in The US.
Brazil,as well as having recently experienced 21 years of military dictatorship(64-85)backed by the US as well as Britain in the 1964 Coup, which brought down the democratically elected Left reformist government of Joao Goulart(see the documentary,’O Dia que Durou 21 Anos’/’The day that lasted 21 years’ by Camilo Tamares),has a long history of Fascist movements going back to the 1930’s.Brazil had the largest Fascist movement outside Nazi Germany.
Bolsonaro’s political machine works very closely with The Trump camp with Steve Bannon as link man as well as with other fascist, far right movements world wide.
I think it is worth mentioning the dominance of the right wing corporate controlled mass media in Brazil.
I would like to know to what extent the media/s used by the huge movement/coalition ‘mobilised’ in support of Lula are being further developed,improved and expanded,in order to more effectively maintain the support of those who have already voted for Lula and reach out to and win over as many as possible of those who firstly didnt vote at all(30 million)or secondly didnt vote for either Lula or Bolsonaro 8/9 million) in the first round.
It is clearly necessary to effectively communicate the policies of Lula(although in many ways quite vague) while effectively countering the ongoing torrent of lies and smears(Bolsonaro’s social media hate campaign,el gabinete del odio), misinformation, disinformation in Brazil as well as in media elsewhere.
Of interest politically and historically is the ongoing fee exhibition at the museum of The Bank of England about the Bank’s involvement with the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade.
In relation to Brazil,The Bank of England ‘secured’ vast billions worth of gold bullion mined in Brazil by African slaves under Portugese colonial rule) which further prompts the need to continue to expose the relationship and links between British imperialism and Latin America both past and present.
The Johnson Government and now the failing and ailing Truss Government support Bolsonaro needs exposing.
Under Bolsonaro,The Amazon,The Planet’s largest carbon sink effectively it’s LUNGS now emits more CARBON than it absorbs !!!