Upon his arrival at London’s St. Pancras International train station, Ernest was seized by the jaws of an unfathomable bureaucratic machine. The French state, aware it could not pry the desired answers from Ernest within its own borders, sent hushed whispers across La Manche, preceding the train’s arrival, preparing the sinister trap that would ensnare him the moment he stepped onto foreign soil. For six hours, he was subjected to questioning about his political beliefs, as though he were but a cog in the British state’s apparatus. It was during the interrogation, in a cold and sterile room, where the true absurdity of his situation revealed itself. The faceless Police interrogators demanded that Ernest disclose the names of the “anti-government” authors in the catalogue of the publishing house La Fabrique, for which he worked. The chilling question hung in the air like a guillotine blade, ready to sever his ties to the free world.
Though released on bail the following day, the confiscation of his phone and computer served as a chilling reminder of the omnipresent power of the French and British state. France and Britain, those great beacons of liberty and free expression, would quickly extinguish their own light at the first sign of a threat. A statement from the publishers echoed the surreal nature of the inquiry:
“Perhaps most seriously, during his interrogation, he was asked to name the ‘anti-government’ authors in the catalogue of the publishing house La Fabrique, for which he works. None of these questions should be relevant to a British police officer.”
Yet there he was, trapped in a world where the French State’s desire for control had insidiously seeped into the realm of literature and ideas. This focus on the political beliefs of authors associated with La Fabrique served as a stark reminder of the precarious balance between liberty and oppression, and the potential for counter-terrorism powers to be manipulated in the pursuit of silencing dissent.
The absurdity of Ernest’s arrest has not gone unnoticed. Publishers, writers, and human rights groups alike have voiced their disquiet, condemning the government’s utilisation of counter-terrorism powers as a means to quash dissent. “This is a chilling attack on the freedom of expression,” warned PEN International, a global writers’ association. The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) joined the outcry, expressing dismay at the extraordinary actions of the British police, who have acted at the request of the French government. Pamela Morton, a senior organiser for books and magazines at the NUJ, remarked, “The arrest of Ernest is a serious threat to the freedom of the press.”
The repercussions of this Kafkaesque ordeal extend beyond Ernest himself, casting doubt on the future of the London Book Fair. The event, a beacon for international publishers and authors, now bears the taint of a government willing to silence dissenting voices. Karen Sullivan, founder of independent publisher Orenda Books, lamented, “This arrest is a major blow to the London Book Fair.”
The disconcerting arrest of Ernest raises grave concerns about the state’s commitment to safeguarding freedom of expression. It is vital that the government acknowledges the scope of its own power and ensures that counter-terrorism measures are not exploited to stifle dissent. The unnerving episode of Ernest’s arrest exposes an eerie interplay between nations, with the French poodle skilfully manipulating the English bulldog’s tail in a sinister dance. This bizarre spectacle underscores the hidden dangers that emerge when one government wields influence over another in matters that jeopardise the essence of individual freedom.
Source >> anti capitalist musings
Art Book Review Books Campism Capitalism China Climate Emergency Conservative Government Conservative Party COVID-19 Creeping Fascism Economics EcoSocialism Elections Europe Event Video Far-Right Fascism Film Film Review Fourth International France Gaza History Imperialism Israel Italy Keir Starmer Labour Party Long Read Marxism Marxist Theory Migrants Palestine pandemic Police Protest Russia Solidarity Statement Trade Unionism Trans*Mission Ukraine United States of America War
Latest articles
- Lose‑Lose Government – PFIs and Neoliberal Pacts
Easy profits for big business at our expense – Dave Kellaway examines how Labour governments’ partnerships with business undermine services. - Peace between neofascists and war on oppressed peoples
Gilbert Achcar explores the parellels between Russia and the USA’s approach to the Ukraine war and to the Arab region. - Stop Trumps sell out: Solidarity with Ukraine ‑Russian troops out
- Rubio: “They must be eliminated; they must be eradicated.”
For all of Trump’s claims to end wars, Susan Pashkoff writes that we may see an escalation of existing wars and the creation of new tensions. - Stop Trump’s sell out : Russian troops out of Ukraine: Solidarity with Ukraine
An ACR leaflet on Ukraine
Already the backsliding begins. ITV news is reporting that the Government has changed one point in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. They have accepted that academies will retain their ‘freedom’ to set their own pay scales for teachers. So the criteria in the School Teachers Pay and Conditions document will only apply to teachers in Local Authority schools. Why have the Government climbed down on this issue? It’s not as if this is a major financial problem for academies. But what will be the next change/climb down by the Government? Will academies be exempt from the National Curriculum? Will Local Authorities be able to build schools according to the needs of their communities or will all new schools, as at present, have to be academies?