Upon his arrival at London’s St. Pancras International train station, Ernest was seized by the jaws of an unfathomable bureaucratic machine. The French state, aware it could not pry the desired answers from Ernest within its own borders, sent hushed whispers across La Manche, preceding the train’s arrival, preparing the sinister trap that would ensnare him the moment he stepped onto foreign soil. For six hours, he was subjected to questioning about his political beliefs, as though he were but a cog in the British state’s apparatus. It was during the interrogation, in a cold and sterile room, where the true absurdity of his situation revealed itself. The faceless Police interrogators demanded that Ernest disclose the names of the “anti-government” authors in the catalogue of the publishing house La Fabrique, for which he worked. The chilling question hung in the air like a guillotine blade, ready to sever his ties to the free world.
Though released on bail the following day, the confiscation of his phone and computer served as a chilling reminder of the omnipresent power of the French and British state. France and Britain, those great beacons of liberty and free expression, would quickly extinguish their own light at the first sign of a threat. A statement from the publishers echoed the surreal nature of the inquiry:
“Perhaps most seriously, during his interrogation, he was asked to name the ‘anti-government’ authors in the catalogue of the publishing house La Fabrique, for which he works. None of these questions should be relevant to a British police officer.”
Yet there he was, trapped in a world where the French State’s desire for control had insidiously seeped into the realm of literature and ideas. This focus on the political beliefs of authors associated with La Fabrique served as a stark reminder of the precarious balance between liberty and oppression, and the potential for counter-terrorism powers to be manipulated in the pursuit of silencing dissent.
The absurdity of Ernest’s arrest has not gone unnoticed. Publishers, writers, and human rights groups alike have voiced their disquiet, condemning the government’s utilisation of counter-terrorism powers as a means to quash dissent. “This is a chilling attack on the freedom of expression,” warned PEN International, a global writers’ association. The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) joined the outcry, expressing dismay at the extraordinary actions of the British police, who have acted at the request of the French government. Pamela Morton, a senior organiser for books and magazines at the NUJ, remarked, “The arrest of Ernest is a serious threat to the freedom of the press.”
The repercussions of this Kafkaesque ordeal extend beyond Ernest himself, casting doubt on the future of the London Book Fair. The event, a beacon for international publishers and authors, now bears the taint of a government willing to silence dissenting voices. Karen Sullivan, founder of independent publisher Orenda Books, lamented, “This arrest is a major blow to the London Book Fair.”
The disconcerting arrest of Ernest raises grave concerns about the state’s commitment to safeguarding freedom of expression. It is vital that the government acknowledges the scope of its own power and ensures that counter-terrorism measures are not exploited to stifle dissent. The unnerving episode of Ernest’s arrest exposes an eerie interplay between nations, with the French poodle skilfully manipulating the English bulldog’s tail in a sinister dance. This bizarre spectacle underscores the hidden dangers that emerge when one government wields influence over another in matters that jeopardise the essence of individual freedom.
Source >> anti capitalist musings
Art Book Review Books Campism Capitalism China Climate Emergency Conservative Government Conservative Party COVID-19 Creeping Fascism Economics EcoSocialism Elections Europe Far-Right Fascism Film Film Review Fourth International France Gaza History Imperialism Iran Israel Italy Keir Starmer Labour Party Long Read Marxism Marxist Theory Migrants Palestine pandemic Police Protest Russia Solidarity Statement Trade Unionism Trans*Mission Ukraine United States of America War
Latest articles
- Syria and the dangers of playing with fire
Gilbert Achcar writes on the origin of the recent bloody clashes in the Druze-majority Suwayda Governorate and the prospects of post-Assad Syria - Remembering Vince Gillespie 1948 to 2025
14 July was the funeral of my dear friend and comrade Vince Gillespie, who died on 22nd June after a short illness and a long life of struggle, joy and history-making, writes Jane Connor - Let Vlad stay!
A Riga-based social-centre project called “Maiznica” is facing repression from state security services and the expulsion of one of their members from the country. In this press release from the Collective they aim to spread the news to a wider audience, to denounce the actions of the Latvian state, and to support the demand of for Vladislav Romanenko to be able to return to the country. They want to expose to the world how Latvia, an EU country and a supposedly “democratic” state, is taking notes from the Russian playbook and using spies against social movements and activists, and they want to bring international pressure on the government to reverse the deportation. - Trump, Netanyahu, and the reordering of the Middle East
Gilbert Achcar writes on Netanyahu’s third visit to Trump since the latter’s second inauguration - Remembering Srebrenica 30 Years On
11 July marked the 30th anniversary of the genocide in July 1995 of over 8,000 largely Bosniak men and male children by Bosnian Serb forces under the command of Ratko Mladic. They were buried in mass graves. Many thousand more fled into the forest and embarked on a harrowing journey lasting up to 7 days before reaching the eastern Bosnia village of Nezuk. Geoff Ryan reflects on what led up to the massacre and how it has been treated compared to two other wars: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians..