On May 22, the British Trades Union Council (TUC) called an emergency demonstration under the slogan ‘Protect the right to strike.” The protest takes place as the Tory government’s misnamed Minimum Service Bill returns to the House of Commons to consider weakening amendments passed by the House of Lords. Whatever parliamentary manoeuvres take place, it is likely this will shortly become law.
The TUC is right that this law fundamentally undermines the right to strike when we already have the most restrictive trade union laws in Europe. But their response is completely insufficient.
It’s not just trade union rights that are being undermined. Recent weeks have seen a stepping up of pre-emptive action by police forces. There is no real right to protest today.
In the run-up to the coronation on May 6, protestors from the group Republic, who had been liaising with the police about their plans, were arrested before anything happened. One was held for 16 hours after being stopped by officers who suspected him and others of carrying “lock-on” devices to tie themselves to inanimate objects.
Three volunteers working to reduce violence against women and girls the night before were detained ’on suspicion of conspiracy to commit public nuisance’. The police stated that they “received intelligence” that people “were planning to use rape alarms to disrupt the procession”.
Receiving less publicity was the heavy-handed behaviour of police in the East Midlands city of Leicester in their response to a pro-Palestinian protest outside the Elbit arms factory. Elbit Systems is the majority supplier of weapons for the Israeli military, including 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet. The campaign group Palestine Action (PA) has been targeting the company in recent years with some success, forcing the closure of one factory in Oldham, in the North West.
On this occasion, activists announced their intention to set up a blockade outside the factory. Two prominent members were arrested on the motorway outside the city, while other protestors had their tents confiscated in the forlorn hope of undermining their plans.
These two operations by the state took place in the context of changes to the law that criminalise ‘potential nuisance’, giving extensive scope for repression. Also of concern was police behaviour towards a pro trans and anti-far right demonstration in south London. Aggressive policing of the left resulted in one woman having a cracked rib, but some police were wearing ‘thin blue line’ badges on their uniforms imported from white supremacist groups in the United States.
This is not the only dangerous import that Britain has seen recently. Local elections took place in some parts of England on May 5, and this was the first time under a new, and badly publicised, law compelling people to produce photographic identification to be able to vote in person. There were stories of up to a quarter of voters in some areas being turned away. Voter suppression is clearly a tool of the right in the United States and elsewhere, and now it is being used in Britain.
It’s clear that a major initiative to defend democratic rights is seriously needed.
EMERGENCY PROTEST outside Parliament tonight (May 22)
6pm
Monday 22
Parliament Square
Art (47) Book Review (102) Books (106) Capitalism (64) China (74) Climate Emergency (97) Conservative Government (90) Conservative Party (45) COVID-19 (43) Economics (36) EcoSocialism (48) Elections (75) Europe (44) Fascism (52) Film (47) Film Review (60) France (66) Gaza (52) Imperialism (95) Israel (103) Italy (42) Keir Starmer (49) Labour Party (108) Long Read (38) Marxism (45) Palestine (133) pandemic (78) Protest (137) Russia (322) Solidarity (123) Statement (44) Trade Unionism (132) Ukraine (324) United States of America (120) War (349)
Latest Articles
- France after the elections: How should the radical left act?
In the wake of the National Assembly’s dissolution and new parliamentary configuration, La France Insoumise (LFI) should adopt a clear stance of radical opposition, emphasizing its commitment to anticapitalist principles and democratic reforms while avoiding any compromise with the existing government unless it secures absolute majority support from the populace, argues Gilbert Achcar. - Why Socialists Oppose the Two‑Child Welfare Cap
In this article, Simon Hannah explores why socialists vehemently oppose the government’s two-child welfare cap, arguing that it stems from austerity measures and reactionary views on the poor. - Hands off Trans Kids
A pamphlet from Anti*Capitalist Resistance. - Two Child Benefit Revolt
Dave Kellaway responds to the revolt by Labour MPs and others to the Labour government keeping the Tories’ hated two child benefit cap. - The beginning of the end of China’s rise?
This is the second interview in a two-part series. The first interview (“Opposing US militarisation in the Asia-Pacific should not mean remaining silent on China’s emerging imperialism“) covered the nature of China’s state, its status in the world today, and implications for peace and solidarity activism.