The Omicron variant is sweeping Europe, and Britain is the epicentre, because of the refusal of the Johnson government to take timely measures to clamp down on it. After yesterday’s anti-vax/anti-lockdown demo in Central London, fascist thugs gathered outside Downing Street to fight the cops. Among the Union Jacks were banners of the fascist organisation Generation Identity. The slogans raised on the placards were for ‘freedom’ and against ‘tyranny’ – just like the Tory hard right in Parliament.
Ten days ago, Tory ultra Steve Baker, fast emerging as the key ideologue of the Tory hard right, made a speech in Parliament around the theme that the government’s Plan B measures – in reality extremely modest and very late – posed the issue of ‘what kind of civilisation do we want to be?’ Do we want to be a civilisation of individual freedom or one of state regulation and tyranny?
In fact the concept of individual freedom defended by the Tory right is very selective – they have no objection to ultra-repressive legislation like the Police, Crime, and Sentencing Bill or the Nationality and Borders Bill.
Libertarianism is reactionary
Nonetheless, it is on the issue of liberty and freedom that the far-right campaign is being built, and its aim is to bring down Johnson and replace him with a more trusted partisan of the Tory hard right like Liz Truss. As a lockdown becomes more and more inevitable, a Tory hard right putsch is being prepared.
If Johnson and Health Secretary Sajid Javid, under pressure from scientists and doctors, bring forward new restrictive measures – of the type being introduced across the whole of Europe – then a major attempt will be made to defeat these measures and oust Johnson.
We should be under no illusions. There are no issues of ‘civil liberty’ at stake here. What is at stake is defence of the NHS against a tidal wave of Omicron cases. Socialists cannot oppose restrictions on some personal ‘freedoms’ in order to defend the interests of society as a whole
Every time governments in the last 40 years have taken action to defend public health by limiting personal ‘freedoms’ (so-called), the Tory right has joined far-right lunatics in campaigning for ‘individual liberty’. Car seatbelts were introduced in 1968, but not made compulsory until 1983. The ‘libertarian’ fringe argues that this should be a matter of ‘personal choice’ – that is, you should have the freedom to kill yourself and your passengers.
Smoking is another classic. The tobacco industry fought a long rearguard battle behind a front organisation called FOREST in opposition to smoking bans in public buildings – only finally introduced in 2006, with, of course, immediate public-health benefits.
Greenlighting anti-social behaviour
A personal anecdote. On 30 September, I had to travel to a medical appointment in central Manchester on the Metrolink, a 40-minute journey. Although Andy Burnham had attempted to hold the line after ‘Freedom Day’ on 12 July, insisting that masks should continue to be worn on the Metrolink, this proved impossible to enforce given the government position that it was now an issue of ‘personal choice’.
By late September last year, only about half of passengers were wearing masks. Most young people especially were not wearing masks. They had got the message that Covid would not affect them severely – an entirely false message and one that encouraged gross ageism. The Tory message – playing to the extreme narcissistic individualism which has itself become a pandemic – was, it won’t hurt me, and I don’t give a shit about the elderly, the disabled, the sick. The removal of any kind of regulation on 12 July had given a green light to absolutely irresponsible ‘personal freedom’.
Socialists are not in favour of individual ‘freedoms’ that are against the collective interests of society (starting, it should be said, with the ‘freedom’ of the rich to dispose of millions of pounds of privately appropriated wealth).
Health workers already have to get vaccinated against a series of infections, so why not against Covid? If care-home workers have to be vaccinated, then why not NHS workers?
As far as vaccine passports are concerned, I cannot use a smart phone because of poor eyesight, and many others cannot for other reasons. I can, however, produce the card I was given that proves I had a booster jab or the certificate I was sent. I can also produce a lateral-flow test result for the previous 24 hours. We should support attempts to clamp down on mass-spreader events at night clubs, sports grounds, and other entertainment venues.
You cannot opt out of society
Incidentally, the crisis in the Premier League is directly linked to the refusal of many young footballers to get vaccinated (who have, in consequence, contracted the virus). In Italy, where 98% of Seria A players have been vaccinated, no games have been cancelled.
Worth saying, too, that it is mainly anti-vaxxers who are causing the crisis in the NHS. People refusing to get vaccinated account for more than 80% of serious-case hospitalisations. This means other people, who cannot get essential treatment, are dying. This is the human meaning of the anti-vaxx bullshit of the Tory right and their fascist allies.
Compulsion should be a last resort. Every effort should be made to counter far-right propaganda and persuade people to protect themselves and protect others. But those who refuse should not be accommodated.
Our key demand should be those repeatedly advanced by behavioural psychologist Steve Reicher on C4 News: financial and other support for people forced to self-isolate, close down or limit their businesses, or work from home. And maximum defence of front-line workers against individuals insisting on their personal ‘freedom’ to refuse vaccination, endanger the lives of others, and clog up the NHS.
The Omicron tsunami is the responsibility of the government for not acting earlier. If a new lockdown occurs, it will be the responsibility of those who argued against the introduction of Plan B sooner.
Forty Tory MPs even voted against compulsory mask-wearing at indoor venues. Labour MPs in the Campaign Groups should never again go through the voting lobby alongside these political Neanderthals.
And no socialist should make any concession to the anti-vaxxers. They represent far-right conspiracy theory, anti-social ‘libertarian’ selfishness, and a bridge to fascism.
Anti-Trade Union Anti-War Art Book Review Books Capitalism China Climate Emergency Conservative Government Conservative Party COVID-19 Creeping Fascism Economics EcoSocialism Elections Event Video Fascism Film Film Review France Global Police State History Imperialism Italy Keir Starmer Labour Party Leaflet Long Read Marxism Marxist Theory NATO Palestine pandemic Police Protest Resistance Books Russia Solidarity Sport Statement Trade Unionism Transgender Ukraine United States of America War
Excellent piece of analysis. The anti-vax movement is a danger and menace, it is a gateway to the very worst kind of conspiracy theories including anti 5G, anti Semitic tropes, and Q-Anon. Creeping fascism in motion. The other side of the same coin are the libertarians, the nonsense of the sovereign individual. In a public health emergency, for a disease we are still learning about, the wellbeing of the ‘group’ has to be paramount, and that means everyone, the elderly, the sick, nobody is expendable/to be sacrificed on the alter of capital. Nobody.
Excellent piece, Phil. Just one tiny error – I think you’ll find ASH is the anti-smoking lobby, not the pro one. Friend of mine is director and she spent years nagging me when I used to smoke.
Thank you Joan, now corrected to show the lobbying group FOREST. Simon (Ed)
I’m a rough sleeper (no doubt Phil Hearse would want to pat me on the head and tell me how sympathetic he was) and I also have a science background. A friend sent me a link to this article. When I read it, I thought “thank god I’ve broken with the left”
So I take it that Jeremy Corbyn, Diane Abbott, Apsana Begum, Dawn Butler etc are closet fascists too. After all they (very courageously) voted with the Tory rebels. Here are the names of internationally respected scientists who have criticised the Covid narrative: Michael Levitt, Robert Malone, Carl Henningon, Karl Friston, Karol Sikora, Sunetra Gupta, Soo Aleman, Jay Bhattacharya, Tim Spector, Brett Weinstein, Ivor Cummins, Raghib Ali. Are they all crypto-fascists? One characteristic of fascism is an intolerance of dissenting views. This seems characteristic of the author, who seems to just echo the establishment view without question.
Very good analysis- much better than the liberal narrative emerging from some on the left like James Meadway and the Novara media types. Bourgeois notions of individual liberty are no help during a major public health emergency that threatens the health service and the lives of the vulnerable and the oppressed.
I think there is a basic problem with Alex’s response to Phil’s article. He implicitly accuses Phil of labelling everyone who opposes anti-covid precautions of being ‘crypto-fascist’. Nothing remotely like this appears in the article. So Phil is being damned for something he didn’t say and doesn’t believe. This is a common form of false argument, where the opponent’s position is distorted in order to facilitate critique; that is, where it is the critic’s caricature that is attacked, not the opponent’s actual position.
So let us re-set. The anti-vaxx movement is rooted in online conspiracy theory. It is an attack on science, reason, and truth. It feeds on a pandemic of extreme narcissistic individualism/selfishness characteristic of the neoliberal era. It is a bridge to fascism.
That does not mean that a majority of the people refusing vaccines – or socialists who believe they have a right to do so – are ‘crypto-fascists’. It means what it says on the box: this argument is rooted in far-right conspiracy theory, the anti-vaxx demos invariably involve organised fascists, and the direction of travel is to the right, the far right.
And it is for that reason that socialists make a very serious mistake in aligning themselves with anti-vaxxers. Just as, incidentally, they made a very serious mistake in aligning themselves with the Tory Right and Farage’s proto-fascists in supporting Brexit.